Character Animation In Blender

Vovelle, Reichardt ...

E l ongoing program of nineteenth century literature is necessarily knowledge of the French Revolution, a historic event organized by our thoughts. Of course, the matter can not be engaged to replace those skills because of it, should be ignored in a course that lasts only fifteen weeks, that which is truly specific: to study the relationship between the concept of revolution, such as reconfiguring end eighteenth century as a result of the historical experience of 1789 and nineteenth-century literary production. ----

During the course, however, require reading a generous selection of articles from Dictionary of the French Revolution, Francois Furet , Mona Ozouf and others, and which can obtain quick but incisive perspectives facts, actors and ideas. But in addition, we strongly recommend that students read, before take at least an introductory book to the French Revolution. ----

The preferred that the chair is Michel Vovelle, Introduction to the History of the Revolution French, trans. Marco Aurelio Galmarini, Barcelona, \u200b\u200bCrítica, 2000 (the book is from 1979 and the 1st ed.'s Translation 1981). This work, both synthetic and sharp, is ten years before the bicentennial of the revolution that brought an avalanche of new texts and generated a dense field of controversies over how to interpret historical, political and ideologically the event. Vovelle anticipates that controversial when reviewed in Chapter 6 the state of the historiography of the revolution to 1979. In turn, interested in the history of mentalities, Vovelle devotes the second part of his book to discuss cultural aspects of the revolution, which is useful for us who study the cultural impact of the revolution in the field of literature. ----

Another commendable job, but more demanding from a historiographical point of view and therefore less suitable as a first reading, is that of Rolf E. Reichardt, The French Revolution and the democratic culture , trans. Carlos Martín Ramírez, Madrid, Siglo XXI editors, 2002 (the book is from 1998). Unlike Vovelle, Reichardt written after the Bicentennial. In order to define the spirit of your company, explains: "The Bicentennial of 1789-not to mention that the flood of magazine articles, has bestowed upon us a five thousand volumes, some of which are issues of sources, monographs and conference proceedings which are fundamental. The procedure, set of old, would be to distill an abstract set of stories 'classic' of the Revolution from Jules Michelet, to Jean Jaurès, to Albert Soboul and Francois Furet / Denis Richet, and garnish with some fruits of current readings, but leaving the bulk of new research literature to sink into the pit of the literature. The sketch offered here attempts a reverse path. Some of the problems and case studies more serious and fruitful arise during the Bicentennial, to reach a new kind of global exposition " (Xvii). ----
Three peculiarities owns Reichardt exposure mode: 1. part of the field and goes to Paris, through the provinces, in order to "desparisizar the Revolution", 2. performs a path from general propositions representative cases, with the conviction that in the historiography of the revolution abound statements and empty formulas, 3. provides an important space to the aspects that constitute the political culture of the revolution, ie, "modes of behavior, values \u200b\u200band collective symbols, as well as media and institutions of communication, sociability and social training of opinion ". In the latter, the emphasis on the cultural dimension, Reichardt Vovelle matches and is, for the same reasons, serves the interests of our program.